Skip to content
Digital Economic Review

The dashboard looks fine. Find out what's actually happening.

A structural review of your acquisition model, what each customer costs, which channels are profitable, and whether the economics hold when you scale. Delivered in 5–7 days.

↓ See what's included
13+Years of experience
5Analysis dimensions
$5k+Monthly spend minimum
5–7 daysDelivery

What is a digital economic review?

A digital economic review is a structural analysis of your acquisition model, what each customer costs to acquire by channel, which channels generate profitable customers versus which generate volume without margin, and whether the unit economics hold when marketing spend is scaled. It connects the numbers that live in ad platforms to the numbers that appear on the P&L, and identifies the structural constraints preventing profitable growth.

The marketing looks fine. The margins don't.

Spend is up, revenue is up, but profit isn't movingWe doubled the budget and the business didn't doubleI'm making budget decisions based on platform reports I don't fully trustI want to scale but I need to know if the economics support it firstSpend is up, revenue is up, but profit isn't movingWe doubled the budget and the business didn't doubleI'm making budget decisions based on platform reports I don't fully trustI want to scale but I need to know if the economics support it first
Spend is up, revenue is up, but profit isn't movingWe doubled the budget and the business didn't doubleI'm making budget decisions based on platform reports I don't fully trustI want to scale but I need to know if the economics support it firstSpend is up, revenue is up, but profit isn't movingWe doubled the budget and the business didn't doubleI'm making budget decisions based on platform reports I don't fully trustI want to scale but I need to know if the economics support it first
The ROAS looks healthy but I can't see it in the marginI don't know what each customer is actually costing usWe're profitable on paper but the cash position doesn't reflect itMarketing is our biggest cost and I can't clearly see what it's returningThe ROAS looks healthy but I can't see it in the marginI don't know what each customer is actually costing usWe're profitable on paper but the cash position doesn't reflect itMarketing is our biggest cost and I can't clearly see what it's returning
The ROAS looks healthy but I can't see it in the marginI don't know what each customer is actually costing usWe're profitable on paper but the cash position doesn't reflect itMarketing is our biggest cost and I can't clearly see what it's returningThe ROAS looks healthy but I can't see it in the marginI don't know what each customer is actually costing usWe're profitable on paper but the cash position doesn't reflect itMarketing is our biggest cost and I can't clearly see what it's returning

What business owners say when the marketing numbers and the business numbers don't agree.

The problem

Marketing metrics measure marketing activity. Not what it does to the business.

Platform reports are built to show platforms performing well. They're not built to show you what acquisition is doing to your margin, your cash flow, or your ability to scale. That's a different analysis, and it requires a different lens.

The dashboard says one thing. The P&L says another.

Platform ROAS is up. Cost-per-click is down. The business is not growing the way the metrics suggest it should be. This gap, between platform performance and commercial return, is structural. It doesn't close by optimizing campaigns.

Scaling spend doesn't scale the business the same way.

At $5k/month the economics look fine. At $20k/month they don't. Most acquisition models have a breakeven point beyond which adding spend produces diminishing returns that aren't visible until you've already committed the budget.

Blended numbers hide what's actually happening.

A blended ROAS of 4x can contain one channel at 9x and another at 1.5x. Decisions made on blended numbers optimize for the average, and gradually shift budget toward whatever the automation favors, not what produces the best commercial return.

IS THIS FOR YOU?

Right fit. Wrong fit.

This is for you if

  • Spending $5,000+ per month across paid channels
  • Running two or more channels simultaneously
  • Revenue is growing but margin or cash flow isn't following
  • You're preparing to scale spend and want the economics validated first
  • Platform metrics and business results are telling different stories

Not for you if

  • Under $5k/month in total ad spend
  • Single channel only with limited data
  • Looking for campaign management or ongoing optimization
  • Need general financial advisory, this is acquisition economics, not accounting
WHY THIS WORKS

Not a campaign performance report.

vs. your agency's monthly report

Agency reports show campaign performance. This review connects acquisition activity to commercial outcomes, margin, cash flow, and whether the model holds under increased spend. It's a different question and a different analysis.

vs. platform attribution

Every platform attributes conversions to itself. Google's attribution says Google drove the sale. Meta's says Meta did. This review builds a picture that isn't anchored to any platform's version of the truth.

vs. building the analysis internally

The data is in multiple platforms in multiple formats. Building a cross-channel economic view internally takes weeks and usually gets abandoned. This review delivers it in 5–7 days with a clear verdict and a roadmap.

WHAT YOU GET

Five dimensions. One verdict on whether the model holds.

Structured acquisition economics review covering CAC by channel, attribution quality, ROAS stability, and scaling viability. Built on commercial analysis, not platform metrics.

Delivered in 5–7 business days. If the review doesn't surface at least 3 structural findings with clear commercial implications, full refund.

Digital Economic Review

You go from making budget decisions on blended averages to knowing exactly what each channel costs, which economics support scaling, and what needs to change before you increase spend.

What a finding looks like

Channel economics, blended vs. isolated CACD

Blended CAC across channels: $38. Isolated by channel: Google Search $24, Google PMax $41, Meta $89. The blended number is being pulled down by Search while Meta and PMax absorb 61% of spend at economics that don't support the business's margin structure.

Implication

Scaling total spend at current channel mix increases Meta and PMax exposure proportionally. The blended CAC will worsen at scale. Budget reallocation toward Search before increasing total spend is the prerequisite.

Example from a real review. Details anonymized.

  1. What each customer actually costs to acquire, by channel, by campaign type, by product category. Not blended averages. The number that determines whether the business can scale.

WHO YOU'RE WORKING WITH

You work directly with me. Not a team, not a junior.

Adela Mincea

Adela Mincea

Marketing Economist

I work with businesses whose marketing spend isn't showing up in the commercial results it should be producing. Economics background, 13+ years in paid media, I read acquisition models the way a CFO reads a P&L.

  • Economics degree, acquisition models analyzed through commercial, not just marketing, lens
  • 13+ years managing multi-channel paid media budgets at scale
  • Multi-channel budgets from $5k to $500k+ monthly
  • Cross-platform attribution analysis across Google, Meta, and programmatic
  • Commercial strategy work for businesses across Europe, Asia, and North America
  • Acquisition economics and unit economics
  • Cross-channel CAC and attribution analysis
  • Marketing ROI and margin impact
  • Scaling viability and budget allocation strategy
THE PROCESS

Simple process. Clear output. No back-and-forth.

You share account access

Read-only access to your ad platforms and any available P&L or margin data. I'll confirm what's needed when you submit.

Confirm scope and payment

Payment link sent within 24 hours. Work starts on confirmation.

Economic analysis

Cross-channel review of acquisition costs, attribution quality, ROAS stability, and scaling economics. Built from your actual data.

You get the review

Scored findings with scaling verdict and roadmap in 5–7 business days.

Pricing

Choose the depth of analysis you need.

Lite

$999one-time

The full economic review delivered as a scored report with scaling verdict.

  • CAC by channel analysis
  • Channel mix & concentration risk
  • Revenue attribution quality check
  • ROAS stability assessment
  • Acquisition model health score
  • Scaling verdict & roadmap
  • Delivered in 5–7 business days
Request review
Most popular

Standard

$1,797one-time

The review plus a 60-minute advisory session to work through findings and budget implications.

  • Everything in Lite
  • 60-minute advisory session
  • Budget reallocation scenario modelling
  • Channel prioritization framework
  • Recording of the session
Request review

Full

$3,500one-time

The review plus a 90-day implementation plan with monthly check-ins on economic performance.

  • Everything in Standard
  • 90-day implementation roadmap
  • Monthly 30-min check-in calls (×3)
  • Budget reallocation executed with your team
  • Economic re-measurement after 90 days
Request review

All prices in USD. One-time payment. No retainer, no surprises.

Before you buy

Common questions.

ANSWER

Read-only access to your active ad platforms (Google Ads, Meta Ads, or others). If you have P&L data or margin information you're willing to share, that significantly improves the depth of the analysis. I'll confirm what's needed when you submit.

ANSWER

The review requires meaningful cross-channel data to be actionable. $5,000+ monthly across at least two channels is the practical minimum. Below that, the findings become too limited to justify the investment.

ANSWER

Lite and Standard are one-time reviews with a clear deliverable and verdict. The Full tier includes 90-day follow-through. For ongoing economic monitoring, we can discuss an advisory arrangement after the initial review.

ANSWER

Attribution audits focus on which platform gets credit for conversions. This review starts with attribution quality as one input but goes further, building a picture of what acquisition actually costs across channels and whether the model can scale commercially.

ANSWER

If the review doesn't surface at least 3 structural findings with clear commercial implications, full refund.

Get started

Marketing is one of your largest costs. Find out what it's actually returning.

Share your channel details below. I'll review and send a payment link within 24 hours.

Your details

I'll review your request and send a payment link within 24 hours.

Not ready to buy yet? Get the monthly newsletter instead →